Will the stammer protect on Trump?

The promise of increasing the defense spending of Sir Kir Stmper will have many consequences. This one day can actually strengthen Britain’s ability to protect itself. More immediately this would mean that billions of billions have been spent on foreign aid.

But what will it be diplomatically buy to the Prime Minister in Washington?

In the recent past, dignitaries used to pay gifts and tributes to the emperors. Starmer will now marked a “more defense spending” with a large good bag at the White House on Thursday.

Donald Trump is the latest in a long queue of American presidents, urging European powers to spend more on their own defense.

The Prime Minister will be able to tell the President that he has heard and acted. He does not want Trump to ask many detailed questions: What does 0.2% of GDP mean in real money? When will Britain actually spend 3% on defense?

But the stammer would like to highlight the idea that UK is responding to Trump’s agenda.

The initial signs are positive. US Defense Secretary Peter Hegseth said that he spoke to his UK counterpart, John Heli, and described the growth as a “strong step from a permanent partner”.

So the announcement of the stormer can hear its leg and the President at the door in the White House.

But will it help him to make a case for the protection of Ukraine and Europe? Will Trump now be more responsible to allow both seats on the conversation table? Will Trump be more open to the idea that the United States should play the role of guaranteeing Ukraine’s safety after the war, which gives European forces air, logistics and intelligence covering, which can help maintain peace on the ground ?

The answer to those questions is not clear. The Prime Minister may suggest that Britain is showing leadership, the way for other European colleagues to follow the suit.

He can also argue that Defense Hike suggests that the UK will not have to say “historical mistake” to choose between Europe and America. In the United Nations on Monday.

The problem is that Trump and his administration have made it clear that their safety priority is China and Europe will simply have to take more care of itself.

“The reality is that what we do is going to pive elsewhere,” the Royal United Services Institute, Deputy Director Malcolm Chalmers told the BBC, is not going to take the lead role in European Security. Half century Performed for more time.

In that context, the government may promise to promise in defense spending that can be seen as a short-term strategic move ahead of a trip to Washington instead of a historical reaction to existing geopolitical changes arising from Trump’s election. Is.

European diplomats told me that they were overwhelmed by the UK’s defense proposal, saying that it was not enough for the real impact. He said that the UK will have to spend at least 3% national funds so that it can give himself a chance to develop the ability that it will need.

To do this, the government will have to do more than raiding the development budget. Assistance charities said that their expenses were a soft target compared to welfare, health and education that spent their expenses.

But some politicians of any political color appear to be ready to give a argument for the change of European welfare models after the war and to prepare voters for massive changes in defense spending.

For now, the government is cutting foreign aid and international donations are fiery.

A decrease of 0.5% to 0.3% of national income means that £ 6BN will be spent on foreign aid each year. Given that the billions of this budget still pay for the hotels of shelter seekers in the UK, the actual amount spent on assistance abroad will be around 0.15%.

The Prime Minister said that the UK would use this remaining assistance to help Sudan, Ukraine and Gaza, supporting climate change and supporting multinational efforts on global health.

Help donations were shocked. Save the Children said that it was a betrayal of the world’s weakest children. One campaign said it would cause major problems for the distribution of important humanitarian aid. The aid network bond said that there will be disastrous consequences for millions of marginalized people.

After Donald Trump, all this freeze the US development expenses, USAID.

By cutting foreign aid, the government has broken the commitment to protect the budget. It has also damaged its policy of using assistance to join countries in the global south.

David Miliband, head of the International Rescue Committee and former labor foreign secretary, said the cut was “a global humanist and development leader for Britain’s proud reputation”.