Trump’s real-estate instinct struggles with the first world art of America

When a real-estate developer becomes an US President, the US foreign policy includes huge help in real-estate development, not surprised.

This is probably the biggest conclusion of Donald Trump for the US to handle Gaza and to convert to a resort for all people of the world – to enjoy it – “Rivira of Middle East”, in his words.

It also presents the latest recurrence of a question that remains as long as Trump has been at the highest level of American politics.

Does Trump’s Gaza Vikas Yojana, which involves rehabilitation of more than two million Palestinians and should the “ownership” of election lands be taken literally or seriously? Both, or neither?

Trump’s proposal flies before the Palestinian people’s depth wishes and are briefly rejected by the Arab countries, which will have to play an integral limb to resume the displaced people from the war -torn Gaza.

It has also triggered the chiefs of the President’s domestic critics in the Democratic Party along with opposition to the international community.

Louisiana Democratic Congressman Troy Carter said, “Development of war -torn land like Trump Golf Resort is not a peace plan, it is an insult.” “Serious leaders chase real solutions, not real estate deals.”

Even some of Trump’s most stable Republican associates seem to be careful with the suggestion of the President that Americans can capture Gaza, clean the debris and remove the unexplained Israeli ordinance.

Lindsay Graham, who represented South Carolina in the US Senate, said on Wednesday, “I think most South Carolinians will probably not be excited about sending Americans to handle Gaza.” “I think it can be problematic, but I will have an open mind.”

Kentki’s Senator Rand Paul was even more blunt.

“I felt that we had voted for America first,” he wrote on X. “We have no business to consider another business to dom our treasure and spread the blood of our soldiers.”

Paul has been highlighted that there has been a clear contradiction in the initial weeks of Trump’s presidency. While Trump has given us foreign aid and promised to focus on American domestic concerns, he has also provoked his comment with American expansionism.

His interest in attaining Greenland remains constant and according to administration officials, fatal is serious. His point of making Canada a “51st state” and re -making the Panama Canal is no longer considered as a joke.

And now Trump, one of the most vocal right wing critics of American invasion and Iraq reconstruction, is suggesting a new Middle East Nation-building project.

For specific ideas behind Trump’s latest proposal, they may be shocking for something, but they should not be too much shock.

The President talked to Gaza and Palestinians to “clean” and resume the Palestinians to comment from an Air Force reporters a day after their inauguration.

During the President’s campaign, he told the Orthodox Radio Host Hug Hewitt that Gaza could “be better than Monaco”, but that the Palestinians “never benefited their” best place “in the Middle East” .

This is not the first time Trump seems to have seen the status of foreign policy as an exciting business opportunity.

During meetings with Kim Jong Un of North Korea in 2018, President Trump performed a miracle on the “great beaches” of the Hermit Nation, which could someday be the “best hotel”.

Those ambitious dreams have been sheltered – and Trump’s Gaza vision, which will require a significant commitment of American blood and fate at one time when it is withdrawing its foreign partnership, almost certainly will definitely fulfill the same fate. .

But Trump’s Gaza proposal represents a marked change in America’s commitment to the two-state solution of the Palestinian status.

A generous interpretation of the American strategy is that it is designed to shake the Middle East powers and forces them to their own resources, and political will, to find a long -term solution of the situation in Gaza.

But such a strategy will come with risks.

Multi-step Israeli-Hamas is hanging in the conflict break balance. Palestinian Trump’s comments can be seen as a sign that America is not interested in a permanent peace, while Israeli hard-liners who are an important part of Benjamin Netanyahu’s governing alliance, they trump it to expand the Israeli settlements. Can celebrate in the form of green lights.

Arab Nations – some of which had previously worked with the Trump administration, which was to produce general relations with Israel in the Abraham Agreement – may be suspected if Trump may be a reliable interaction participant in his second term. .

There is now evidence that Trump’s attention may move on a moment notice. Finally, he can abandon all efforts to broke the Palestinians and their Arab colleagues, a durable Middle East peace, which he can reject his decision to reject the possibility of better life removed from previous struggles Can see.

Then it is back to trading wars with mining sites in Canada, North Korea, mining sites in Greenland or some other challenge, which does not divide its own party or appears to There is a need to solve centuries.