Stammer strategy to work with team trump

Week after the week, the Prime Minister’s questions were a serious but poignant ritual at the beginning of the time.

The Prime Minister will start by accepting the name and rank British soldiers and women will be killed to serve their country.

But what happened this week was different.

How was this done how it was done or the MP became silent and listened to respect as the seriousness of this moment.

But separately because this time the Sir Kire Stmper was marking the anniversary of deaths rather than recent people, which is not normally.

And he was doing this to deliberately mark the tasks, not comment, what did the government think about the US vice -president JD Vance’s comment about military sacrifices of America’s colleagues,

This dilemma is a case study in the faces of the UK ministers: they are trying to have a close and productive relationship with a white house, known for the shooting of its mouth.

The NO10’s approach is one of the discretion and avoids temptation to comment.

Or to keep it more seriously, do not go to a slanging match with team Trump as you are sure to lose.

So when the European leaders were exploiting various levels of social media oprobium on Friday evening. President Zelanski’s bumpy meeting in WashingtonThere were no downing street.

The Prime Minister, we were later told, both President Trump and President Zelansky were on the phone to try to patch things.

In other words, both try to carry forward things to take advantage of relationships with the two: governing, not comment.

Now put himself in the Prime Minister’s shoes.

You are firm to maintain this discipline because you consider it intelligent, practical and in the national interest of the UK.

But this is also true, ReferendumThat much more people in the UK are important for Donald Trump, which, compared to their support, especially on their operations of Ukraine.

In comparison, Sir Kir’s approach is Welcomed by many people,

But what do you do to deal with those who can think that Sir Kir is getting very comfortable with President Trump, and, importantly, what do you do when their team does something that you can understand uncertainly uncertain?

The second night JD Vance went to Fox News and claimed that the US plan for Ukraine “better security guarantee that some random country’s 20,000 soldiers have not fought in 30 or 40 years”.

There are only two countries that have publicly stated that they will provide soldiers, UK and France, none of whom have mentioned the vice -president.

But a lot of comments in Britain were angry with a lot of comments, whether they were in the context of Britain or not.

And the government found a mechanism, recently in co-opting and reviving a ritual, but this time to mark the anniversary, to clarify its approach.

When American reporters later asked the Prime Minister’s team why they had done this, they strictly stuck with their strategy: not to comment.

They did not, and they did not need it.