Whitty says

England Chief Medical Officer Prof. Sir Chris Whity has urged MPs not to extremely complicated the aided laws to introduce it.

Giving evidence to a committee of MPs, he said that the best security measures were simple and there was a risk that the patient could end in “bureaucracy thick” at the end of life if it was too much to navigate.

Under the proposed bill and being viewed by the cross-party group of MPs, adults in England and Wales to live with less than six months, if two doctors and a High Court judge agrees to their lives The abolition will be allowed.

But other doctors who gave evidence said that they were concerned about safety measures.

Dr. Sarah Cox, of the Association of Patrimiv Medicine, which represents doctors that provide the end of life care and opposes changing the law, said: “I and my colleagues are concerned.”

He said that someone has to live that someone has been accurately assessed to be “incredibly difficult”, while when someone was being forced, it was not always possible to identify, especially when it was subtle.

She was speaking in front of MPs on Tuesday morning after Sir Chris appeared – on the first day the committee investigated the aided dying bill. About 50 witnesses are going to provide evidence this week.

The MPs voted in favor of the bill in November, but it was just the first phase and will now go through months investigation and further votes.

Sir Chris told the MPs that the doctors were accustomed to assessing mental capacity in patients and determining how long someone had to live, it was not “precise science”, in most cases the doctor can take the appropriate central view “. Were.

He said: “What we do not want is a system that is very difficult for them to navigate, so they spent six months – if this bill has been passed and they choose to take care of which One is a minority – essentially a bureaucracy got stuck in thick.

“We need to keep it simple and my idea is the best safety measures simple safety measures.”

Meanwhile, retired High Court Judge Nicolas Mostin said he thought that it would be “impossible” to rule in every aided dying case for the High Court.

“High Court, I am confident that I have come from there, not getting the ability.”

MPs were also told that a separate service should be established to provide assisted dyeing.

Dr. of British Medical Association Andrew Green, who is neutral on law changes, said: “We believe it should not be a part of any doctor’s normal job. It should be installed as a separate service. It will assure the patients. It will assure it. Their normal care is not part.

Sir Chris said that MPs also want to argue whether such a service should be completely separated from NHS and warned that it would take some time to install it.

He said that the two years made by the bill were a “appropriate starting point”, but some things could take more time.

And he also stated that it was important to identify the subcutaneous care, still not a high enough standards because “we would expect”.

He said that the situation should not make the situation “better or worse” while changing the law, improvement should also be seen at the end of life care.